Skip to content

Manufacturers and industrial companies

Manufacturing FP&A for more than one plant, entity or ERP

Someone exports each entity's trial balance, stitches them together, and is the only one who can explain the hardest line in the consolidation. We set up one model with the general ledger detail behind every number.

Jim Jenkins, CFO, Essex Finishing

One entity, one ERP, and a reporting package that already ties? This page won't add much. Start with the budget or the close.

Where does manufacturing FP&A break down?

Usually once there is more than one entity, plant or ERP. Add a currency or an acquisition and the reporting package takes longer every month.

  1. Entities on different ERPs. An acquisition or a foreign subsidiary brings its own system and its own chart of accounts.

  2. Trial balances without the detail. When the consolidation doesn't tie, nobody can see what is rolling up into the account.

  3. Lines nobody can explain. Currency translation gets worked out in a side file.

  4. Margin by plant or product line, built by hand. Every month, from exports.

  5. Equipment debt modelled outside the P&L. So covenant headroom is a surprise at quarter-end.

13 of the 55 companies in our review of sales calls (September 2026) named multi-entity and intercompany pain. The most common trigger was an acquisition, for 12 of the 55.

What manufacturing finance teams say

Three entities, two ERPs, and the hardest line in the consolidation finally shows its math, after moving from Planful to Vena.

“I think Vena is much more flexible for our needs and more robust than Planful was. All we did with Planful was upload trial balances. So the fact that Vena has all of our general ledger detail right there is extremely helpful.”

Karen Maderas

Controller, Samson Rope

Samson Rope
Read the full story

A working P&L model in the first week, still growing with the business

“Within the first week, MCC provided a working P&L model we could actually use. As the business grew, the model grew with us instead of needing to be rebuilt. They didn’t just build a model - they acted like a true partner and focused on helping us get it done.”
Tony Ehrbar

Tony Ehrbar

Owner & CEO, American Tent

American Tent
Read American Tent's story

Monthly reporting moved out of manual Excel and into Vena, and now it flags when someone changes a closed period in NetSuite.

“I found inconsistencies from how I was doing things before, and now this forces a level of consistency. And frankly it better highlights when I find things that we have gone back and changed in NetSuite in closed periods. All of a sudden, wait a minute, this looks different than how I reported last month. So it helps me catch things that we shouldn't have done.”

Jim Jenkins

CFO, Essex Finishing

Essex Finishing
Read the full story

A 30-minute call to check whether MCC fits your finance team. Bring whoever builds the file. We'll tell you plainly if it's not a fit.

See whether this fits your team

Questions from manufacturing finance teams

Can we consolidate entities that run on different ERPs?

Yes. Samson Rope consolidates three entities in the US, Spain and France, and France runs on a different ERP from the other two. In Vena they now have full general ledger detail and a 24-page reporting package, and the team can drill down to see exactly what rolls up into any account.

We already use another planning tool. Is moving to Vena worth it?

Samson Rope did exactly that. In Planful they only uploaded trial balances. In Vena they have all of the general ledger detail, and their controller calls Vena much more flexible for their needs. Reports start from an existing report or spreadsheet, so nothing gets rebuilt from scratch.

Will our team depend on MCC after go-live?

No. At Samson Rope, since go-live, the assistant controller has built cost center reports and the 2027 budget templates herself, with MCC support hours behind her. We build so your team can maintain the model, and we stay close while they learn it.

Do we need to clean up our accounting system first?

Not necessarily. Essex Finishing built its financial reporting in Vena on top of NetSuite as it was. The build showed where reports built by hand in Excel had not matched, and now Vena uses the same logic every time and shows right away when someone changes a closed period in NetSuite. The build shows you what needs cleaning up, so you don’t have to fix everything first.

Is this only for larger manufacturers?

No. American Tent had a working P&L model from MCC within the first week, and as the business grew, the model grew with it instead of being rebuilt. A smaller manufacturer usually needs a model the owner can use now and the finance team can extend later.

How long does it take, and how much of our team's time?

The foundation takes five business days once readiness is confirmed. Your next month-end or forecast is the first real cycle, and tailoring runs over the weeks after. On your side: you own access and exports, answer mapping questions fast, ideally the same day, and run the first cycle with us beside you. At Air Carbon, with MCC coaching, their FP&A lead was building templates and reports within a few days.

Further reading

Last updated

See whether this fits your team

A 30-minute call with someone who has done this build before. Bring whoever builds the file. You'll leave knowing whether we're a fit, which problem is really yours, and what the first five days would build.