The Consolidation Challenge
For finance leaders, consolidations are often the most painful, time-consuming process. Multiple entities, currencies, ERPs, and reporting requirements mean teams spend more time chasing numbers than analyzing them.
Static spreadsheets, endless email chains, and manual reconciliations create delays, errors, and compliance risks. By the time numbers reach leadership or the board, they’re already stale.
Who Needs This ?
Empowering finance leaders to plan, forecast, and pivot without friction.
Multi-entity companies (subsidiaries, global operations, joint ventures)
Private equity/VC-backed firms with portfolio roll-ups
High-growth businesses scaling into new markets or acquisitions
Finance teams stuck in Excel hell at month-end close
Proof From the Field
FirstService Residential
Property Management
Consolidation cycle reduced by 90%
“The biggest factor was ease-of-use because Vena is Excel-based. If you’re working in finance or FP&A, you’re already an advanced Excel user.”
— Robbie Phillips, FP&A Director, FirstService Residential
ADAC
Manufacturing • SysPro ERP
Budget cycle shortened by 77%
“The time savings with Vena are huge. We’re spending less time preparing the numbers and more time actually analyzing and understanding the business.”
— Avo Koulakian, VP Finance & IS, ADAC
Arizona Cardinals
Sports & Entertainment
Delivery time reduced from 10 days → 5 seconds
“We’ve been able to produce commission statements that used to take 10 days in just seconds. Trust in Vena has been huge for our adoption.”
— Christine Harms, Controller, Arizona Cardinals
Boskalis
Industrial
Standardized consolidation across ERPs
“Before Vena, everybody was exporting from their ERP system to Excel to build reporting. It took hours per employee. Now it takes no time because it’s always ready to use.”
— Pieter Klem, Controller, Boskalis
Typical Financial Planning Pain Points | The MCC+Vena Advantage |
|---|---|
Why teams switch to MCC
Immediate Benefits
-
Month-end close time reduced by 30–70%
-
Audit-ready records with tracked approvals and changes'
-
Increased accuracy and confidence in reported numbers
-
Finance freed from chasing balances → more time for analysis
-
Lower compliance risk and better stakeholder trust
If nothing changes
The Cost of Not Improving
-
Longer close cycles → leadership operating on stale data
-
Compliance risks with regulators, auditors, and investors
-
Staff burnout from manual reconciliations and late nights at month-end
-
Increased cost of audit due to missing trails and inconsistent processes