Skip to content

Consolidation and group reporting

Consolidation that doesn't live in one person's head

Someone stitches the entity exports together every month and is the only one who understands the eliminations. When they're out, the close waits.

15 of 55

buyer companies named manual consolidation and the month-end close as their biggest burden, more than any other pain.

Source: 55 buyer companies quoted in MCC sales conversations, 2026.

Is this the wrong page?

One entity with nothing to eliminate? This isn't your problem, and this page won't help much. Start with reconciliation and the close, or the budget.

Why it gets worse, not better

Acquisitions were the most common trigger we heard, from 12 of 55 buyer companies. Every new entity added to a spreadsheet close makes the next close worse, and not in a straight line: another chart of accounts to map, another set of intercompany balances, often another currency.

What changes

The old way compared with The new way
The old wayThe new way
Someone exports each entity's trial balance and stitches them together by hand.Every entity's actuals load into one consolidated model on a schedule.
Each entity has its own chart of accounts, mapped in a spreadsheet only one person maintains.One mapping to the group chart of accounts, kept in the model where the whole team can see it.
Intercompany eliminations get worked out fresh every month.Eliminations run the same way every month, whether that person is on holiday or not.
Currency translation is a tab with rates typed in by hand.Rates load once and translation runs the same way for every entity.

In their words

Groups that moved their consolidation off hand-stitched spreadsheets, in their own words:

Reporting, planning and non-financial metrics in one model

“MCC did a fantastic job working with us on our unique requirements, our reporting requirements and our planning requirements. They were also able to help us pull in data that was non financial, that's going to help us track metrics that are important to our company and how we work. Very customizable, couldn't be happier.”

Christina Keel

CFO, Earth Systems

Read Earth Systems's story

Three entities, two ERPs, and the hardest line in the consolidation finally shows its math, after moving from Planful to Vena.

“I think Vena is much more flexible for our needs and more robust than Planful was. All we did with Planful was upload trial balances. So the fact that Vena has all of our general ledger detail right there is extremely helpful.”

Karen Maderas

Controller, Samson Rope

Read the full story

NetSuite and the warehouse system in one consolidated model

“MCC connected NetSuite and the warehouse system into one consolidated data model, eliminating manual consolidation and saving time. Their templates enabled accurate seasonality planning and trailing 12-month analysis, making budgeting more reliable. Highly recommended.”

Mark Garcia

CFO, Arctic Cold

Read Arctic Cold's story

An entity structure of subsidiaries and consolidation, understood quickly

“Has a great understanding of financial reporting which made the transition as easy as possible. They quickly understood our entity structure of subsidiaries and consolidation as well as our business.”

Jay Abrahams

Accounting Systems Manager, Eagle Bank

Read Eagle Bank's story

Days of manual work, now automated and trustworthy

“Working with MCC and Vena has been a game-changer for our finance team. MCC’s team brought a level of professionalism, technical expertise, and empathy. The collaboration transformed how our organization plans, monitors, and reports financials. What used to take days of manual work is now automated and trustworthy.”

Julian Boaitey

Director Of Finance And Operations, ASTC

Read ASTC's story
“MCC quickly understood the complexity of our consolidation requirements and translated them into a clear, practical solution.”

Paulo Tabarelli Batista

Global VP Finance, Beyond One

Read Beyond One's story

Questions finance teams ask about consolidation and group reporting

How do you consolidate financial statements for multiple entities?

Load each entity's trial balance, map every account to one group chart of accounts, translate foreign entities into the reporting currency, eliminate intercompany balances and transactions, then add the entities up. The adding up is the easy part. The hard part is doing the mapping and the eliminations exactly the same way every month.

In a spreadsheet close, each of those steps depends on someone remembering how they did it last month. That's what makes the close fragile, not the arithmetic.

How do intercompany eliminations work at month-end?

When one entity sells to, lends to or charges another, both record it. At group level those amounts cancel out: intercompany revenue against intercompany cost, receivables against payables, loans against loans. Eliminations remove them so the consolidated statements only show business with the outside world. Mismatches between the two sides are where closes stall.

The fix is less about the elimination entries and more about matching: both sides recorded in the same period, at the same amount, in accounts the model recognizes as intercompany.

How do you handle currency translation for foreign subsidiaries?

Under the usual current-rate method, assets and liabilities translate at the closing rate, income and expenses at the rate for the period (an average is common), and equity at historical rates. The difference goes to a translation reserve in equity. In a spreadsheet close, the risk is rates typed in by hand, differently for each entity.

Can you run consolidation in Excel, and when does it stop working?

Yes, and plenty of groups do for years. It stops working when the file outgrows the person who maintains it: more entities, a second currency, or an acquisition on a different chart of accounts. The warning signs are a close that waits on one person and eliminations nobody else can explain without asking them.

Should consolidation happen in the ERP or in a separate model?

If every entity runs on one ERP instance with one chart of accounts, the ERP can often consolidate well. Groups with several ERPs, acquired entities still on their own systems, or planning and board reporting that need the same consolidated numbers usually do better with a separate model that pulls actuals from every source.

Last updated

Where this happens in how we work

Consolidation gets built at the foundation stage, on your own trial balances, and proven in the first real close. The part that usually slows it down is mapping decisions nobody made yet, like which entity carries shared costs.

This fits if

Any of these sound familiar

  • You run more than one legal entity.
  • Entities use different charts of accounts, or different ERPs.
  • Intercompany transactions are eliminated by hand.
  • At least one subsidiary reports in another currency.

Probably not a fit if

  • Nobody on your side owns the numbers, and nobody will.
  • You need a fully custom design signed off before you see anything working.

Email me this page

Not ready to talk yet? Save this page for later, or send it to your CFO. One email, not a newsletter you didn't ask for.